Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship Hub

Program Topics and Structure

Frameworks for Entrepreneurship

Objective

Our perspectives on entrepreneurship have evolved. Although the Industrial Revolution gave rise to entrepreneurs such as Rockefeller (oil), Vanderbilt (railroads), Carnegie (steel), and J.P. Morgan (banking/) significant obstacles remained. One of these was the lack of knowledge about developing and launching a business. Only with the modern frameworks that emerged during the late 20th century have we started to demystify this process. An often-quoted analogy is that building a startup is like building an airplane while falling off a cliff (i.e., you improvise everything mid-air). The idea of a "framework" is that one can follow a blueprint/a process and adopt a mindset/an attitude to improve your chances of success and mitigate risks as you build a startup. A framework cannot take place of inspiration and motivation. Neither can ir provide you access to talent and capital. However, it can provide you the structure that you need during the inherently messy and chaotic nature of entrepreneurial activity. On this page, we will establish the idea of frameworks for entrepreneurship, introduce three frameworks: effectuation, lean startup and disciplined entrepreneurship that you can draw upon, and provide guidance about when and how you can draw upon (and even combine) these frameworks so you can impose structure on your entrepreneurial journey. 
Disclaimers 

What is an Entrepreneurship Framework

Entrepreneurship frameworks are structured models or systems that help entrepreneurs identify opportunities, assess risks, develop strategies, and build successful ventures. They can act as maps that guide entrepreneurs through the chaotic and uncertain world of starting and growing a business. They can help with: 

  • Structured Thinking: They provide a clear structure to navigate uncertainty.
  • Decision-Making Tool: Help prioritize tasks, allocate resources, and make critical decisions.
  • Risk Management: Reduce blind spots by identifying and mitigating potential risks.
  • Scalability: Enable entrepreneurs to plan for sustainable and scalable growth.
  • Focus on Key Metrics: Highlight important success factors (e.g., product-market fit, customer acquisition).
  • Communication Tool: Facilitate alignment within teams and with stakeholders.

Evolution of Frameworks

A review of writing and research suggests the following major milestones in how entrepreneurship frameworks have evolved:

EraKey IdeasWhat was (and is) missing

Classical Era (18th–19th Century) 
Entrepreneurship as risk-taking and innovation
Entrepreneurs as risk-takers and adventurers

  • Adam Smith: Entrepreneur as merchant-capitalist who organizes labor and resources efficiently driven by "self-interest"
  • Joseph Schumpeter: Entrepreneur as innovator who mobilizes resources to drive change towards "creative destruction"
  • Attempting 'creative destruction.'
  • Few structured processes.
  • Success tied to charisma, resourcefulness, and boldness.
  • Lack of Practical Tools (no actionable steps for entrepreneurs)
  • No Focus on Execution (emphasized "what an entrepreneur is" but said little about "how to be one")
  • Over-Reliance on the Individual Heroic Entrepreneur.

Managerial Approach (Mid-20th Century)
Entrepreneurship as disciplined management
Entrepreneurs as innovators and value creators

  • Peter Drucker: Entrepreneurship not just as a business activity but as a discipline and practice aimed at "systematic innovation" applicable across various sectors
  • Can exist across organizations not just start-ups.
  • Focused on managing risk.
  • Engaged in creating value for the customer
  • Static Planning in a Dynamic World (assumed stable markets and predictable environments)
  • Neglect of Customer Discovery (lacked an emphasis on understanding and validating customer needs)
  • Slow Adaptability: Traditional planning was often slow and resistant to change

Strategic Entrepreneurship (1980s–1990s)
Entrepreneurship as competitive strategy
Entrepreneurs as strategists and differentiators

  • Michael Porter: Success comes from understanding and positioning within competitive forces.
  • Saras Sarasvathy: Entrepreneurs start with means at hand and leverage partnerships to reduce risk.
  • A focus on mindset and analyses
  • Exploration of entrepreneurship as strategy
  • Execution Gaps (focused heavily on analysis but less on practical execution)
  • Iterative Feedback Loops Missing (no built-in mechanisms feedback and improvement)
  • Bias Toward Established Firms (better suited for established companies rather than startups)

Lean Startup Era (2000-2010s)
Entrepreneurship as iterative experimentation
Entrepreneurs as experimenters and listeners

  • Eric Ries: Test assumptions with MVPs before scaling.
  • Steve Blank: Build what customers want, not what you think they want.
  • Alex Osterwalder: Map out and iterate on your business strategy in a clear, visual format.
  • Entrepreneurship as testing tentative hypotheses
  • Iterations based on testing and improvements
  • Focus on understanding the customer
  • Scalability and Long-Term Planning (Lean frameworks often lacked guidance for transitioning from validation to scaling)
  • Strategic Vision Gaps (getting stuck in pivot loops without a clear long-term vision)
  • Limited Beyond Startups (harder to apply to scaling ventures or corporate innovations)

Contemporary Frameworks (2010s-Present)
Entrepreneurship as disciplined, structured scaling
Entrepreneurs as problem-solvers and designers

  • Kim and Mauborgne: Innovate to create uncontested markets instead of competing in crowded ones.
  • Bill Aulet: Follow a structured, step-by-step roadmap from idea to scalable product.
  • Tim Brown: Solve problems with a human-centered approach through prototyping and iteration.
  • Discipline and structure for actions
  • Recognition of the customer but adding structure to manage risk
  • Flexibility vs. Structure (frameworks e.g. Aulet's Disciplined Entrepreneurship can feel overly rigid)
  • Handling Extreme Uncertainty (assumptions of some stability in resources and markets)
  • Recognition of Ecosystems (such as partnerships, global supply chains not explicit)

 

What does this Evolution tell us?

Ideas around what constitutes entrepreneurship, and what an entrepreneur does are evolving: 

  1. From Intuition to Data: Entrepreneurship is evolving from gut instincts to data-driven experimentation.
  2. From Solitary to Ecosystems: Entrepreneurs are going from being lone pioneers to networked collaborators.
  3. From Static Plans to Adaptive Systems: Entrepreneurs are moving away from rigid business plans to agile, iterative cycles.
  4. From Singular to Hybrid Frameworks: Entrepreneurs are starting to combine Lean / Disciplined / Effectuation principles.
  5. From Profit to Purpose: Entrepreneurs are starting to aim for a triple bottom line (profit, people, planet).
  6. From Lone Wolf to AI Partnership: Entrepreneurs are relying on AI tools to enhance the entrepreneurial journey.

What's next? 

  • Contemporary frameworks are starting to incorporate AI, relying on LLMs and conversational capability along with real-time data integration to speed up the process. As one example, see the MIT Orbit Platform (Bentley community members have access). 
  • Hybrid frameworks are starting to emerge that recommend combination of Lean Startup, Disciplined Entrepreneurship, and Effectuation to allow both, recognition of individual action and experimentation along with efforts for scaling.
  • Researchers and practitioners are recognizing the need for new frameworks aimed at maximizing value within networked ecosystems and emphasizing collaboration-first strategies instead of only designing products and services. 
  • We seem to be heading towards ideas such as "Purpose-Driven and Sustainable Entrepreneurship" with an emphasis on the Triple Bottom Line (Profit, Peopld and Planet). Startups are starting to focus on sustainability, social impact, and ethical practices towards B Corp certification.  
    Key Thinkers: John Elkington, Paul Polman
  • See another Tab on this page [Alternatives] for a comparison of some of the key frameworks.
References and Resources (Several are available as part of the E-Hub Library of Books)
  1. Aulet, B. Disciplined Entrepreneurship: 24 Steps to a Successful Startup. Wiley; 1st edition (August 12, 2013). 
  2. Blanc, S., Dorf, B. 2020. The Startup Owner's Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. Wiley; 1st edition (March 17, 2020).
  3. Cheek, P. 2024. Disciplined Entrepreneurship Startup Tactics: 15 Tactics to Turn Your Business Plan into a Business. Wiley; 1st edition (April 2, 2024)
  4. Brown, T. 2019. Change by Design, Revised and Updated: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Business; Updated edition (March 5, 2019).
  5. Drucker, P. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Routledge Classics. (November 2, 2015)
  6. Elkington, J. 2020. Green Swans: The Coming Boom in Regenerative Capitalism. Fast Company Press (April 7, 2020)
  7. Kim, W. Chan, Mauborgne, R. A. 2015. Blue Ocean Strategy, Expanded Edition: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant. Harvard Business Review Press; Expanded edition (January 20, 2015). 
  8. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. 2010. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley and Sons; First Edition (July 13, 2010). 
  9. Polman, P., Winston, A. 2021. Net Positive: How Courageous Companies Thrive by Giving More Than They Take. Harvard Business Review Press (October 5, 2021)
  10. Porter, M. 1998. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press. 
  11. Ries, E. 2011. The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Currency; First Edition (September 13, 2011).
  12. Sarasvathy, S. 2009. Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing. 
  13. Smith, A. 1776. The Wealth of Nations. Penguin Classics; First Edition (March 25, 1982)
  14. Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper Perennial Modern Classics (November 4, 2008)

Do you need to use a Framework? 

If you consider yourself a risk-taker and want to build your start-up without relying on a framework, you can certainly do that, improvise everything! But it will be like throwing away good knowledge and accumulated wisdom that is readily at hand. If you follow some structure that a framework will provide you - it will likely to maximize your chances of success and mitigate risk. 

Identifying Alternatives 

It is difficult to determine what is/is not an entrepreneurship framework because the intent and scope often varies. For example, some may characterize business model canvas as a framework. Others argue that the business model canvas is a technique for visualizing different components of a business model. You can follow these links to learn more about the business model canvas and business models as a part of this knowledge base. As another example, some may  characterize Tim Brown’s design thinking (aimed at generating creative solutions to a problem) as a framework. Others argue that it is a technique for human-centered design that builds on empathy, ideation, prototyping with an emphasis on user needs and a focus on generating product design and user experience. 

In the table below, we focus on three frameworks that are aimed at start-up entrepreneurship: (a) Lean Startup, (b) Effectuation, and (c) Disciplined Entrepreneurship. In addition, we describe two others that are aimed at clarifying entrepreneurial activity within established organizations: (d) Five Forces, and (e) Blue Ocean Strategy.  See another tab on this page [Why Frameworks] for the evolution of frameworks and key references.

Comparison of Key Frameworks

We summarize and compare these important frameworks here to highlight core ideas along with key strengths and limitations.  

Framework

Focus

Core Question

Key Strengths

Key Limitations

Lean Startup
(Eric Ries)
Product-Market Fit"Will people buy this?"Iterative, rapid cyclesCan lack strategic vision
Effectuation
(Saras Sarasvathy)
Entrepreneurial mindset"What can we do with what we have?"Adaptability, frugal innovationLess structured
Disciplined Entrepreneurship
(Bill Aulet)
End-to-end process"How do we systematically build this?"Comprehensive stepsCan feel rigid
Five Forces
(Michael Porter)
Competitive Strategy"How do we gain an advantage?"Strategic clarityLess suited for early-stage uncertainty
Blue Ocean Strategy
(Kim and Mauborgne)
Market Creation"How do we create uncontested markets?"Focuses on differentiationRisky without execution clarity

 

Similarities and Differences 

The similarities in the frameworks are tied to a focus on the customer (understanding the customers' needs) and encouraging exploration/iteration instead of perfection. They promote experimentation to varying degrees. By suggesting either a mindset or a structures set of steps, they also aim to reduce uncertainty and provide the entrepreneurial teams some help to manage risk. The differences can be traced to their suitability for early-stage startups (e.g. Lean Startup) compared to others that also include growth and scaling (e.g. Disciplined Entrepreneurship). Some are focused more on the philosophy and mindset (e.g. Effectuation) compared to others that require a structured investigation of internal and external fources (e.g. Five Forces). 

References and Resources
  • See the references and resources listed in the tab "Why Frameworks"?

What is Effectuation Theory

Effectuation Theory (Sarasvathy 2009), is a mindset and decision-making framework for entrepreneurs operating in conditions of extreme uncertainty. Unlike other frameworks that focus on planning the future, Effectuation focuses on what is within your control right now and leveraging existing resources creatively.

An Example

Imagine you are a chef who walks into your kitchen. Instead of starting with a predefined recipe, you:

  1. Look at the ingredients you already have in your kitchen (Bird-in-Hand Principle)
  2. Decide how much time and money you’re willing to spend on this meal (Affordable Loss Principle)
  3. Call a friend to join you and see if they want to bring over extra ingredients (Crazy Quilt Principle)
  4. Keep the stove and tools ready to adjust and improvise as you cook (Lemonade Principle)
  5. Decide to serve the meal only if the outcome seems worthwhile (Pilot-in-the-Plane Principle)

This is the fundamental idea of Effectuation: start with what you have, collaborate, improvise, and manage uncertainty through creative action.

The Five Principles of Effectuation

PrincipleDescriptionExample
Bird-in-Hand Principle - Start with what you have.

Focus on your means: who you are, what you know, and whom you know.

Don't wait for the perfect idea, funding, or conditions.

A photographer starts offering freelance services with the camera they already own instead of waiting to buy high-end equipment.
Affordable Loss Principle Limit your downside risk.

Only invest resources (time, money, energy) that you can afford to lose.

Instead of maximizing returns, focus on minimizing risks.

A cafe owner starts by offering catering services part-time to test demand before committing to opening a full café.
Crazy Quilt Principle - Form partnerships to reduce uncertainty.

Bring in partners who share your vision and can contribute resources.

Build relationships rather than relying solely on contracts or formal agreements.

A solo consultant partners with another freelancer who has complementary skills to pitch joint projects.
Lemonade Principle Embrace surprises as opportunities.

When something unexpected happens, turn it into an advantage.

Instead of rigid plans, stay flexible and opportunistic.

A startup discovers that customers love one minor feature of their app and decides to pivot and focus entirely on that feature.
Pilot-in-the-Plane Principle Focus on what you can control.

You are the pilot of your venture; your actions shape the outcome.

Don’t wait for external conditions to align; act decisively.

Example: A creative writer doesn’t wait for a publisher but self-publishes an eBook and builds an audience online.

 

 

Should you use Effectuation principles for your startup? 

The principles of Effectuation theory are a great fit for Solopreneurs and Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs). In the table above, you can see several examples that clearly point to this focus. If your team is building an Innovation-driven Enterprise (IDE), you may need a different framework. 

Here is a way to think about this: Effectuation is about control through action and resourcefulness, while Lean Startup is about validation through iteration, and Disciplined Entrepreneurship focuses on systematic execution.

References and Resources
  1. Sarasvathy, S. 2009. Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing. 
    1. Access a useful summary here

What is the Lean Startup Framework? 

The Lean Startup framework (Ries 2011) is an approach to entrepreneurship that suggests the application of "lean principles" to entrepreneurship. These ideas have a long history with applications in manufacturing, software development, project management and many other fields. For entrepreneurs, the Lean Startup framework suggests this: Instead of trying to build the perfect product in isolation - build, test, and learn iteratively with real feedback, making small corrections along the way.

Instead of designing and building a product called iPhone 10 over two decades (and then launching it in the hope that the customer will like it), consider building a small paper prototype, test and adjust different features, build a first version, and keep iterating and testing with your customers. You may even feel that you are ready to launch this first version it in the market (iPhone 1) if your resources allow and continue iterating and refining. This is the essence of the Learn Startup framework. 

An Example

Imagine you're a chef who walks into your kitchen. Instead of starting with a predefined recipe, you:

  1. Prepare a small, simple version (minimum viable dish) with core ingredients and basic techniques to test if it’s edible (Build)
  2. Gather honest feedback (flavor, presentation, and overall experience) from a friend who will taste your MV dish. (Measure)
  3. Analyze the feedback to determine what worked and what did not: seasoning? texture? (Learn)
  4. Iterate quickly by adjusting the recipe: new ingredients/change cooking techniques to create an improved version. (Pivot or Persevere)
  5. Once your refinements to the dish start getting consistent positive feedback, prepare a larger batch/add it to your menu. (Scale)

This is the fundamental idea of the Lean Startup framework: start small, test assumptions, gather feedback, iterate rapidly, and scale only when there's evidence of demand.

The Five Principles of the Lean Startup framework

PrincipleDescriptionExample
Build an MVP: Start with the simplest, smallest version of your product that still provides value to test assumptions without wasting unnecessary resources.Build: create a first version of the product/service (MVP Minimum Viable Product).Before building their product, Dropbox created an explainer video showing how their file-syncing software would work (without having to build the actual technology). The video generated a large number of email sign-ups overnight, proving demand for the product.
Build-Measure-Learn Cycle: Quickly create an MVP that can be used for market testing and iterative refinements

Build: create an MVP of the product/service.

Measure: have people try it (collect customer feedback).

Learn: based on feedback, tweak the product/service for the next attempt.

Instagram started as Burbn, an app for checking in at locations, making plans, and sharing photos. The founders noticed users mostly used the photo-sharing feature. They measured user behavior, learned that photo-sharing had the most traction, and stripped away all other features to focus solely on photo sharing.
 
Validated Learning: Conduct experiments to generat clear and simple insights that can guide the next iteration

Experiment: with multiple versions (called A/B testing)

Analyze: to derive specific lessons learned such as evidence for or against features 

Zappos wanted to test if people would buy shoes online. Instead of building a complex e-commerce site, they took photos of shoes from local stores, listed them online, and bought the shoes manually whenever someone placed an order. It showed that customers were willing to buy shoes online, leading to the execution and success at Zappos.
Pivot or Persevere: If you assess that you are off-course, pivot (change strategy and direction), else, persevere (keep working in the same direction).

Reflect: on what you are learning to make conscious decisions 

Avoid: stubbornly sticking to a failing plan and be willing to adjust

Twitter started as Odeo, a podcasting platform. When Apple launched iTunes Podcast, Odeo faced irrelevance. The team pivoted, using their existing resources to create a microblogging platform where users could post short updates—Twitter. The pivot proved successful.
Innovation Accounting: "Evaluating progress when all the metrics typically used in an established company (revenue, customers, ROI, market share) are effectively zero" (Ries 2017, see Article in Inc. magazine)

Use Leading Indicators instead of traditional metrics 

Consider: (a) customer-focused dashboard, (b) Leap of faith assumptions dashboard, (c) Net present value dashboard (see Article in Inc. magazine

As they launched, Airbnb did not focus on vanity metrics such as sign-ups or website visits. Instead, they tracked Customer Retention: How many people who booked once came back for a second trip; and Engagement: Whether hosts and guests were actively using the platform. By focusing on actionable metrics, Airbnb could iterate effectively, tweaking user experience to drive repeat usage and growth.

 

Should you use Lean Startup principles for your startup? 

The principles of the Learn Startup framework are a great fit for Startup ventures that have high uncertainty about your product, market, or customers. If you find yourself in the early stage with an idea and a concept but need to validate core assumptions quickly, the lean startup principles can be useful. This is particularly true when you are surrounded by competitors who may potentially launch similar products or services and the underlying components (such as technology platforms) are rapidly changing (e.g. a new mobile app where you do not know if and how your customers will actually use it). On the other hand, if you have a clear understanding of your product/service and target market, have access to resources, and need to pay attention to regulatory hurdles (e.g. a medical device where precision and compliance may be critical), you may want to consider other frameworks such as Disciplined Entrepreneurship.

Here is another way to think about this: Lean Startup is about iterative learning based on feedback (imagine learning to ride a bike). You try, fall, adjust your balance, and learn quickly through trial and error. 

References and Resources
  1. Ries, E. 2011. The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Currency; First Edition (September 13, 2011).
  2. Blan k, S. 2013. Why the Lean Start-Up Changes Everything: A faster, smarter methodology for launching companies may make business plans obsolete. https://hbr.org/2013/05/why-the-lean-start-up-changes-everything 
  3. Ries, E. 2024. https://theleanstartup.com/ 
  4. Mollick, E. 2019. What the Lean Startup Method Gets Right and Wrong. https://hbr.org/2019/10/what-the-lean-startup-method-gets-right-and-wrong 

What is the Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework?

Disciplined Entrepreneurship (Aulet 2013) has been an influential entrepreneurship framework in academic and startup circles. As the phrase suggests, the framework argues that Entrepreneurship (like many other things) can be taught and learned. The framework contains 24 steps (across 6 themes) that provide a step-by-step guide to exploring and pursuing the entrepreneurial journey. Since its launch, the framework has been taught at the MIT Martin Trust Center for Entrepreneurship as well as several other universities. In 2024, the framework was extended the ideas by outlining startup tactics (Cheek 2024).

The core ideas behind the original Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework (Aulet 2013) and its extension, described as Startup Tactics (Cheek 2024) can be elaborated thus: Entrepreneurship isn’t just an art or a series of random experiments. It is a systematic, disciplined process that can be broken down into clear, actionable steps.

An Example

Imagine you're a chef who walks into your kitchen. Instead of starting with a predefined recipe, you:

  1. Decide who you are cooking for: someone who loves spicy food/family with kids/health-conscious eaters (Step 1: Who is Your Customer?)
  2. Understand their need: they are hungry/they want a restaurant-quality meal at home (Step 2: What Can You Do for Your Customer?)
  3. Decide to prepare a meal - quick, delicious, and fits their specific dietary preferences. (Step 4: What’s Your Value Proposition?)
  4. Prepare a sample dish that captures the essence of your idea and serve it to your customer for feedback. (Step 6: Design a Prototype)
  5. Adjust based on what they liked or disliked—less salt, more spice, or a different presentation. (Step 9: Iterate on Your Product)
  6. Define the steps needed to prepare the final dish consistently and efficiently. (Step 15: Design a Business Model)
  7. Prepare multiple servings and maybe even plan to open a catering business. (Step 21: Scale the Business) 

A Structured Approach (Themes and Steps)

Disciplined Entrepreneurship Figure

The Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework suggests the following themes and steps

  • Theme 1: Who is your customer? Define the end user and economic buyer.
  • Theme 2: What can you do for your customer? Identify the value proposition.
  • Theme 3: How does your customer acquire your product? Develop a go-to-market strategy.
  • Theme 4: How do you make money from your product? Develop a business model and pricing strategy.
  • Theme 5: How do you design and build your product? Build your MVP (Minimum Viable Product).
  • Theme 6: How do you scale your business? Plan for growth and sustainability.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moving to Startup Tactics

The Startup Tactics compilation (Cheek 2024) is a practical extension to the Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework (Aulet 2013). Whereas the original framework points to "what" needs to be done at each step, the startup tactics describe the "how." They provide specific, actionable strategies that teams can implement to overcome challenges and execute those steps effectively. The startup tactics, thus, provide a "how-to" guide for tackling the nitty-gritty details of executing each step. This focus on tactical execution is evident in each of the tactics. Here are some examples:

Startrup Tactics
  • Example 1
    • Define your target customer (as part of the logical sequence of steps laid out in the Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework).
    • Tactics: how to gather and analyze customer data to validate assumptions about your target customer. The startup tactics, thus, add detailed tactics, strategies, and examples to help founders execute each step effectively.
  • Example 2
    • Define how your product uniquely delivers quantifiable value to your customers (as part of the logical sequence of steps laid out in the Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework).
    • Tactics: how to map out specific use cases for your product and calculate the time or cost savings it generates. If building a software tool that saves businesses time, use industry-specific benchmarks to estimate hours saved annually and assign a dollar value.
  • Example 3
    • Develop the smallest functional version of your product to test with real customers (as part of the logical sequence of steps laid out in the Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework).
    • Tactics: How to use rapid Prototyping with no-code tools (e.g., Bubble, Webflow) to create mockups or prototypes quickly; Get potential customers to co-create the MVP by providing feedback at each iteration; Use Figma to build clickable mockups, share these with customers, and adjust based on usability feedback before writing a single line of code.

 

Should you use the DE framework for your startup? 

The unique value of the Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework (and now, with the extension Startup Tactics) is the comprehensive, step-by-step guide it provides for launching and scaling a startup. It combines customer insight, business model design, and product execution into an actionable process. While other frameworks emphasize specific areas (e.g., MVP, market fit, competition), Disciplined Entrepreneurship integrates them all into a cohesive entrepreneurial roadmap.

If you are a First-Time Entrepreneur, the Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework and the Startup Tactics are a fantastic guide to ensure you do not skip critical steps. The combination of these two is also useful when you need structure and clarity, particularly for teams that may be overwhelmed by the chaos of early entrepreneurship. And finally, if your startup venture involves building a complex product or service, where you will need to pull together several concerns such as understanding the customer, developing the product/service offering, visioning the business model, planning for scaling the operations and more - the disciplined entrepreneurship framework will be useful. It will be particularly helpful for technology-driven startups. On the other hand, if the uncertainty levels are high (in terms of product/service design and customer segments), you may want to consider the lean startup principles, at least during the early stages of the entrepreneurial journey, before switching to the larger roadmap suggested by the disciplined entrepreneurship framework along with startup tactics. 

The MIT Orbit Platform

Building on their decade-long work to evangelize the Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework (and now, the Startup Tactics), the Martin Trust Center at MIT has been developing a platform that brings the power of AI that allows you to access different steps fully integrated with external data sources. With this platform, you an start with a brief description of an idea and explore each step of the Disciplined Entrepreneurship framework (24 steps) as well as the Startup Tactics (15 tactics) quickly. What used to take entrepreneurial teams months or even years of work is now at your fingertips. This does not mean that the Orbit Platform will build your startup. But - it will provide you analysis results that are based on access to a number of data sources on the web. 

Through a collaboration between the Bentley E-Hub and the Martin Trust Center for Entrepreneurship at MIT - you now have access to the Orbit Platform as a member of the Bentley community. All you need is your Bentley email Id to signup and you can access the power of the Orbit platform.

 Access the Orbit Platform

References and Resources
  1. Aulet, B. Disciplined Entrepreneurship: 24 Steps to a Successful Startup. Wiley; 1st edition (August 12, 2013). 
  2. Cheek, P. 2024. Disciplined Entrepreneurship Startup Tactics: 15 Tactics to Turn Your Business Plan into a Business. Wiley; 1st edition (April 2, 2024)

Startup vs. an Existing Company

Being entrepreneurial does not have to mean that you are launching a startup. You can be entrepreneurial and launch new initiatives within a company as well. This suggests the first differentiator for choosing a framework:

  • As a Startup choose from these → Effectuation / Lean Startup / Disciplined Entrepreneurship (and Startup Tactics)
  • As an Actor in an Existing Company choose from these → Porter’s Five Forces / Blue Ocean Strategy

Pursuing a Startup Solo vs. As a Team 

  • For a Solo Entrepreneur pursuing a Startup:
    • As a first-time entrepreneur, consider → Lean Startup.
    • As a technical founder with a long-term product vision, consider → Use Disciplined Entrepreneurship
    • As a serial entrepreneur with deep market experience, consider → Picking elements from different frameworks.
  • For Teams pursuing a Startup:
    • If you have a small, scrappy team, consider → starting with Lean Startup for agility.
    • If you have a larger team with a complex product, consider → Disciplined Entrepreneurship to add structure.
    • If you have a highly experienced team working in a familiar market, consuder → Choosing elements you need from different frameworks.

Based on the Type of Startup 

Type and ExampleChallengesRecommendation 1Recommendation 2

Solo-preneur: Consultant or Creative Entrepreneur

Example Scenarios: Freelance writer, graphic designer, personal consultant.

Limited resources and team.

Irregular income.

Need for adaptability.

Best Framework: Effectuation Theory

Start with what you have: Leverage your existing skills, network, and tools.

Minimize risk: Invest only what you can afford to lose.

Focus on partnerships: Collaborate with others to expand your reach.

Secondary Framework: Lean Startup (if iterating on a specific offering).

Analogy: You’re a jazz musician, improvising your performance based on the instruments and people around you.

 

SME Entrepreneur: Café or Brewery Owner

Example Scenarios: A local coffee shop, small brewery, boutique store.

Balancing upfront investment vs. risk.

Attracting and retaining local customers.

Managing day-to-day operations efficiently.

Best Framework: Disciplined Entrepreneurship

Step-by-step approach: Reduces guesswork in building and growing the business.

Focus on clarity: Market segmentation, pricing strategy, and resource allocation are mapped out systematically.

Secondary Framework: Effectuation for early stages or resource-constrained beginnings.

Analogy: You’re building a house brick by brick with a detailed construction plan.

Family Business: Extending or Diversifying

Example Scenarios: A family-run retail store launching an e-commerce platform, a textile mill diversifying into home décor.

 

Balancing legacy and innovation.

Managing family and professional relationships.

Expanding into new markets or verticals.

 

Best Framework: Blue Ocean Strategy

Market differentiation: Avoid direct competition and carve out a unique niche.

Strategic innovation: Leverage existing strengths to explore uncontested market spaces.

Secondary Framework: Porter’s Five Forces for competitive analysis.

Analogy: You’re sailing your ship out of crowded waters into the open ocean.

 

Innovation-Driven Enterprise (IDE): Tech Startup Team

Example Scenarios: A biotech startup, SaaS product team, deep-tech company.

High uncertainty and risk.

Balancing product development with market validation.

Managing investor expectations.

Best Framework: Lean Startup

MVP and Iteration: Build quickly, test, and learn.

Reduce uncertainty: Validate assumptions before scaling.

Secondary Framework: Disciplined Entrepreneurship for scaling phase.

Analogy: You’re a scientist running small experiments before scaling up production.

Side-Hustle Entrepreneur

Example Scenarios: Selling handmade crafts on Etsy, tutoring online, blogging for revenue.

Limited time and resources.

Balancing primary job with side hustle.

Achieving steady revenue growth.

Best Framework: Effectuation Theory

Start with what you have: Use your current skills, network, and spare time.

Affordable loss: Invest limited time and money without jeopardizing your main job.

Secondary Framework: Lean Startup if you plan to scale the side hustle.

Analogy: You’re planting seeds in a small garden plot and growing crops at your own pace.

 

 

Combining Frameworks 

Entrepreneurs who have learned about the ideas underlying entrepreneurship and are aware of the different frameworks may also create their own unique hybrid frameworks by combining elements from different frameworks. Here is an example of how you may do this (there are many possibilities as you might imagine): 

  1. Start with Design Thinking: Define customer pain points and prototype solutions.
  2. Move to Disciplined Entrepreneurship: Follow the 24 steps for clarity and execution.
  3. As a part that, Use Lean Startup to add Agility: Embed Build-Measure-Learn loops within the execution phases.
  4. Visualize with Business Model Canvas: Map your business strategy periodically.
  5. Refine with Blue Ocean Strategy: Identify and carve out uncontested market spaces.
     

This page is a summary of important considerations and jump-off point for additional exploration, not a comprehensive reference.

Prepared by Dr. Purao, Director, E-Hub. Last Update: Dec 2024.